In real life people
have many different problems to deal with. In fiction, characters tend to have
the one problem. They struggle to deal with it but it’s always there, affecting
them and the story you’ve put them in.
This is necessary
for fiction, otherwise things would be too vague and woolly. We need the cop to
be an alcoholic, the kid to be scared of going to school, the woman to be
obsessed with getting married, and so on. It doesn’t really matter if their
issue is one we’ve seen before (like the ones I’ve just mentioned), because it
isn’t the actual problem that people are interested in, it’s how it’s dealt
with.
Which means you have
to show it being dealt with.
This can come off as
a bit contrived. The guy with terrible vertigo ends up facing the villain on
top of the Eiffel Tower etc. But people are so keen to see the internal
struggle brought out into the open that they’ll overlook these sorts of
contrivances. But that doesn’t mean you can’t find a better way to bring inner
and outer struggles together.
It is possible to write
a story where the inner and outer stories don’t connect. If the cop whose son
died sees a shrink and does his job all morose and bitter, then even though his
case is about a gay serial killer his struggle with grief can affect his
personality and his approach to his job.
His inner struggle
basically becomes characterisation, a way to give his personality some depth.
However, if the case
he’s working on is the kidnapping of a child about the same age as his son would
have been, then not only does it resonate more with his personal demons, it
also offers many more opportunities for the inner and outer stories to clash
and create conflict and drama.
His mental state
will affect how he goes about finding the boy, and the search for the boy will
affect his mental state.
This is a typical
sort of set up where it’s very convenient that the two strands intertwine. But despite
this, the need of the audience to see a person face the thing they find hardest
to deal with is so strong that even a clunky set up can be satisfying if the
contrivance is established quickly and then the focus is placed on the
consequences.
On the other hand, if
our bereft cop requests a transfer onto the kidnap case because he feels a
connection with this missing kid or the scared parents, then his personal instigation
of the intertwining can remove a lot of the contrived feel.
Rather than
serendipity forcing the two together, his inner struggle driving him to get
involved with events similar to those he himself is dealing with not only makes
sense, it also offers opportunities for drama and conflict.
This focus on how
the character’s demons push him towards things that resonate with his inner
struggle will also make the character behave in a way that’s very useful for
the writer.
While simply having
the school kid and the bully being partnered up for chemistry by the teacher
will enable you to have them work their way to an odd-couple friendship, if the
school kid is the one who asks the teacher to put them together, thinking it
will help them sort out their differences, then it suddenly gives you a much
better idea of how the story might go and how it might go wrong before it goes
right.
That doesn’t mean you can’t make it work the other way, but once you
have the main character as the main force behind the story it becomes much
easier to get the ball rolling.
If a woman has a
disastrous affair with her married boss and swears off men and decides to
transfer to the New York office, and finds her new boss to be devilishly
handsome and (surprise, surprise) attracted to her, then we have a fairly
standard set up for a romance.
Even though the
chances of her finding herself in just the situation she was hoping to avoid
creates the ideal setting for exploring her issues with men and love and
relationships, clearly the writer (me) engineered the scenario in a very
obvious manner.
But if the woman
chooses the NY office because the boss there is very unappealing and not her
type at all, and because of that reason she feels very comfortable and
unflustered around him and is able to do her job, and all this success and
behaving like a human makes her fall for Mr Ugly, then her issues are what got
her into this predicament rather than the writer’s manipulation.
A simple adjustment to
make it the character’s choice to get involved with the plot of the story,
based on whatever issues they happen to be dealing with, will give the reader a
stronger sense of who the character is, and the writer a quicker way to connect
the character to the plot in a natural and emotionally satisfying manner.
If you found this post useful please give it a retweet. Cheers.
10 comments:
They say don't let things happen to your character, let the character make things happen, and that's a good example of why.
If you make something happen to the character, it may end up feeling like an unbelievable coincidence. If they make the choice, it feels less contrived.
Interesting that we both posted about coincidence today. Must be something coincidental in the air. You've dug into some very good examples of how to turn coincidence into characterization and plot tension.
It's said that there is nothing new under the sun, meaning issues and problems our characters face have been done many times. But then we also face such issues many times. It's easy to contrive a situation and quite another to build the story with choices the character chooses. I think there is a stronger story if the character has to face their issues and overcome them. You're right, the character has to choose and that come easier if you have built a well developed character. Their choices are more interesting and somewhat surprising.
Interesting article. :-)
Sia McKye Over Coffee
I just finished a novel where the character becomes addicted to pain medication and conveniently enough when he needed to be not addicted to it anymore, that just magically was the case. I would caution anyone to be careful with these demons and not make it contrived by faking a sudden recovery. I see this a lot and it's a huge annoyance to me.
Great post and excellent food for thought.
Wow. Facing the demons can really change the direction of the story.
I'm definitely Pro-Choice! lol No seriously, I hate those B-movie type things where the plot's denouement just happens to involve the mc's phobia or problem. Overdone or what? Great post as always!
@Alex-it's a little harder to do, but pays dividends.
@Sarah - it happens so often (especially in movies) that I think we tend to turn a blind eye most of the time.
@Lee - in real life coincidences can be quite remarkable, in fiction not so much.
@Sia - thanks.
@Diane - it is tempting to take the easy route when you have the power to do so. In real life I'd take that option in a second.
@Lilith - very true.
@Lexa - cheers.
Hi Moody, I read a craft book where the writer talks of the character's inner struggle, inner journey versus external journey. He stressed on the importance of fighting the inner demons which make the character come across as strong and multi-dimensional.
Or the villain to be stupid. Like Voldemort using that killing curse on Harry. Used it as a baby and it didn't work. Used it again after Cedric died. Didn't work. So at the end of the story...he uses it again because...why the fuck not...right? It's got to work sometimes...oh and not destroying the Pensieve thing in Dumbledore's office. That would have been my first thing if I were a super villain. "What? My enemy uses a thing to sift through his memories for clues about my plans? Yeah go and destroy that. Hit it with a sledge or something." But nope nope nope. Gotta be powerful and stupid otherwise there is no story.