The point of language is to communicate your thoughts. The
rules of language are there to clarify structure and prevent misreading. If you
can communicate what you want to communicate without following those rules,
that’s perfectly okay.
However, it’s easier to follow the rules because that’s why
they’re there—to clarify your meaning—and most people are already aware of them.
And, generally, if you’re not sure if it should be a
semi-colon or an em-dash, is the adverb necessary, does the repetition work as
emphasis or is it clumsy, chances are you’re over-thinking it.
I know what I want to say but I don't know how to say it is another way of saying you don't really know what you're trying to say.
It’s far better, when faced with a complicated sentence you
aren’t sure how to punctuate, to rewrite the whole paragraph from scratch. Don’t
waste time trying to communicate your literary skills, focus on communicating
the story. And definitely don’t do a half-assed job and leave it to the reader
to figure it out for themselves.
Of course, for every cast iron Thou must... commandment from the writing gods, there is at least a
handful of writers who did the opposite and did it well. But there was a reason
why it worked for them. You don’t have the right to cite them as a
justification for why you can do the same if you don’t understand that reason.
If you write something down and then look at it thinking, I’m not sure what this is saying, but maybe someone
will like it, then you’re just splashing around in the water to no real
purpose. I’m not saying you’re drowning, but it’s going to take you a long time
to swim across the English Channel that way.
Take time to figure out what you want to say. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying don’t
study grammar (to be honest you should already know all the basics you need
from school), but when people point out technical errors in your writing, what
they’re really saying is I was so bored/confused/lost that I started counting adverbs.
The only real secret to getting your writing to work in a
way where the reader is too involved with the story to bother thinking about
how many adverbs you’ve used, is to just read it back to yourself and decide,
consciously, if it says what you want it to say.
It really is that simple, and yet it’s one of the hardest
things for aspiring writers to do. They avoid looking too closely because they’re
afraid of what they might see. What if it
isn’t clear what I mean? What do I then? Start again? Oh, god, no...
This isn’t a question of talent, it’s a matter of laziness. We
may not all be equally talented but we are all equally lazy. Yes, more work will
be required. One draft, throw your pen on the ground, walk out of the room with
both hands raised... that’s not how it works (sadly).
But if you take a section of your work that doesn’t sit
right with you (or even if other people say it doesn’t work) and play around
with it, change the structure, the wording, whatever—and then you decide you
preferred it the way it was, that’s okay.
That’s not to say it now works and everyone who thinks otherwise
is wrong, it could be terrible, but by being aware there’s an issue, and
seeking to address it, your brain is on the case. Even if the writing
ultimately fails to do what you hoped it would do, you will learn something. That’s
all part of the writing process, to discover your own approach to language with
its quirks particular to you.
In most cases, however, that time spent going over a
sentence, a chapter, a whole story, will produce alternative ways of doing it.
Better ways. Sometimes change comes incrementally, sometimes all at once.
We all use language every day. We all make mistakes every
day. Whether in writing or speaking, we all screw up is small ways all the
time. Yet we manage to make ourselves understood.
Along with our capacity to communicate our own thoughts, we
also have the ability to understand other people’s. Even when they make it difficult,
we want to understand. It’s the communication that’s the important thing, far
more than the technicalities of which words you choose to employ.
And bear this in mind: Anytime you feel mired in getting the
grammar right, the punctuation correct, when you can’t figure out where the commas
go, most likely the real problem isn’t a poor grasp of the Queen’s English. Chances
are you’re not really sure what you’re trying to say.
If you found this post of use, please give it a retweet or leave a comment. Or both. Or neither. God save the Queen.
17 comments:
Making the sentence or section shorter usually simplifies it for me. Often if I'm faced with s paragraph that needs clarity, I just end up deleting it all together.
As an editor and writer, I always say, keep it simple, stupid. I had a writer friends who once asked if he could critique my first chapter. Actually, he rewrote the first paragraph and while the language read pretty, it made absolutely no sense whatsoever.
I'm working on a second draft now and most of the sentence construction I have to fix is because I didn't follow the rules or tried to say too much in one complicate sentence.
I love how you took the picture of David from Prometheus to illustrate communication. I liked how communicating with the aliens in Prometheus was such a big aspect of the show. In the extended scenes, we actually know what David said to the engineer. That's kind of interesting. Something about "Paradise" to which I have no clue.
@Alex-saves a lot of hassle in the long run.
@Nancy-not that you can't write complex sentences, but you need to have a strong idea of what you're trying to say.
@SG/K- it does feel like you could get more across quickly if you just put it in one sentence. Usually makes it less clear not more.
@Michael-if only they'd communicated a bit more with the audience...
Ain't that the truth!
You know, I waste a lot of time fiddling with punctuation, word choice, etc. Usually I get it right the first time and end up reverting to my initial choice anyway. I should trust my gut/mad skillz more. :)
@Emily-sometimes i guess you have to go all round the houses to find out you shoul have stayed where you were. Certainly true for me.
That is very true! Although it took me a while to be comfortable with my grammar skills to be able to rise to the discomfort level of dealing with content, rather than punctuation.
@Lydia-I think you've identified the problem beautifully. It's more comfortable looking at the technical bits than honestly appraising content.
This post really sparked my thinking about writing. For me transparency is the ideal. Anything that calls attention to itself--an overly pretty sentence, an odd or strained metaphor--distracts readers from the story. So do lack of clarity, clumsy sentences, and a monotonous style. It takes me several revisions of a manuscript to approach that ideal of transparent prose, but I can't even begin without knowing what I want to say.
@Mary-I think with a strong enough story you can mess around a bit, but a well written poor story rarely holds anyone's interest.
"...but when people point out technical errors in your writing, what they’re really saying is I was so bored/confused/lost that I started counting adverbs." - So True
There are like half a dozen quotable sentences in this post. Very well done!
I agree with you that we should take time to figure out what we want to say.
@Jeff-cheers.
@Rachna-saves time in the long run!
Awesome advice. You do need to know what you want to say in order to convey it clearly. My first draft is to get the story down and then in the rewrites I can work out what the message of the story is and that can dictate my rewrites.
@Charmaine-cheers.
i read your blog post, your blog content is very informative japan scholarship 2021 for international students